TSLL vs. TSLR
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLL returned 12.29% vs 14.03% for TSLR. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSLL charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
TSLL vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSLL having a -30.60% return and TSLR slightly higher at -29.95%.
TSLL
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -13.76%
- YTD
- -30.60%
- 6M
- -39.72%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- -4.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -13.83%
- YTD
- -29.95%
- 6M
- -39.07%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -30.60% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 5.43% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -29.95% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLL and TSLR is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between TSLL and TSLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSLL vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLL
TSLR
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLL
TSLR
Basic Materials
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Communication Services
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Energy
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Financial Services
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Healthcare
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Industrials
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Real Estate
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Technology
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Utilities
TSLL
-
TSLR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLL vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLL
TSLR
TSLL vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLL | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLL vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLL | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.88% | -82.80% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.75% | -54.37% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.96% | -64.15% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -50.38% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.50% | 27.20% | +0.30% |
Volatility
TSLL vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) have volatilities of 26.80% and 27.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLL | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.80% | 27.26% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.55% | 56.88% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.23% | 88.73% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.82% | 115.34% | -8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.82% | 115.34% | -8.52% |
TSLL vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLL vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 7.37% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TSLL and TSLR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLR has higher volatility (27.26%) compared to TSLL (26.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs TSLR's -82.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 14.03% vs 12.29% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, TSLL has been the lower-risk option at 26.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 1.50% for TSLR.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLL and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer