GUSH vs. NBIG
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GUSH is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
GUSH vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 73.60% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- 73.60%
- 6M
- 49.22%
- 1Y
- 84.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- -36.93%
NBIG
- 1D
- 6.23%
- 1M
- 96.57%
- YTD
- 487.61%
- 6M
- 268.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 73.60% | -3.96% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 487.61% | -62.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and NBIG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
NBIG
GUSH vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUSH | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSH | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 1.38 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -75.83% | -24.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.79% | -3.94% | -95.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -42.82% | -50.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.58% | — | — |
Volatility
GUSH vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.49% | 200.64% | -145.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.21% | 200.64% | -132.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.70% | 200.64% | -106.94% |
GUSH vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.44% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and NBIG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer