NBIG vs. ARMG
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
NBIG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 126.41% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 190.00% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -36.58%
- 6M
- 133.65%
- YTD
- 126.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -46.26%
- 6M
- 220.35%
- YTD
- 190.00%
- 1Y
- 59.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.17M | $20.37M | $65.80M | |
| $50.87M | $45.72M | $37.32M |
NBIG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 126.41% | -59.80% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 190.00% | -61.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and ARMG is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG
NBIG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.77% | -80.28% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.61% | -73.55% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -52.13% | +10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.08% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 50.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 128.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.72% | 149.49% | +69.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.72% | 145.42% | +73.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.72% | 145.42% | +73.30% |
NBIG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NBIG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
NBIG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.68% | 4.86% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer