PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIG vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIG vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 493.04% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 888.42% return.


NBIG

1D
-3.05%
1M
152.75%
YTD
493.04%
6M
321.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-3.36%
1M
219.03%
YTD
888.42%
6M
521.40%
1Y
507.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIG vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
493.04%-62.34%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
888.42%-64.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIG and ARMG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIG vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIG

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIG vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIG vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIGARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.18

+0.26

Drawdowns

NBIG vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIGARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-80.28%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-3.36%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.30%

-53.19%

+9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.55%

Volatility

NBIG vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIGARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

201.62%

130.25%

+71.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

201.62%

138.46%

+63.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

201.62%

138.46%

+63.16%

NBIG vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBIG and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NBIG vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NBIG and ARMG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIG and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer