PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 69.71% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -2.31% return.


GUSH

1D
1.40%
1M
-9.75%
YTD
69.71%
6M
53.49%
1Y
78.64%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
-36.58%

IFED

1D
-1.64%
1M
6.11%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
69.71%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%9.86%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-2.31%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and IFED is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.44

The correlation between GUSH and IFED shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSHIFEDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

0.27

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

0.51

+1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

0.33

+2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

0.84

+5.84

GUSH vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSHIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.27

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.66

-1.10

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-22.36%

-77.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-14.65%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-22.36%

-41.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-4.31%

-95.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-5.84%

-87.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.46%

5.74%

+6.72%

Volatility

GUSH vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.24%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.72%

4.24%

+16.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.44%

12.80%

+30.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.63%

16.17%

+39.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.20%

19.88%

+48.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.74%

19.88%

+73.86%

GUSH vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.47%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and IFED have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to IFED (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 17.19% vs 12.18% for GUSH. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.45% for IFED.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer