GUSH vs. HIBL
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%) while HIBL tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GUSH returned 9.46%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for HIBL. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.
Performance
GUSH vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 80.33% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 61.19%
- 6M
- 49.15%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- -36.52%
HIBL
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- 15.37%
- YTD
- 80.33%
- 6M
- 73.92%
- 1Y
- 226.21%
- 3Y*
- 49.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 61.19% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 129.94% | -97.38% | 17.77% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 80.33% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and HIBL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between GUSH and HIBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GUSH vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUSH
HIBL
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
GUSH
HIBL
Basic Materials
GUSH
HIBL
Communication Services
GUSH
-
HIBL
Consumer Cyclical
GUSH
-
HIBL
Consumer Defensive
GUSH
-
HIBL
Financial Services
GUSH
-
HIBL
Healthcare
GUSH
-
HIBL
Industrials
GUSH
-
HIBL
Real Estate
GUSH
-
HIBL
-
Technology
GUSH
-
HIBL
Utilities
GUSH
-
HIBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
HIBL
GUSH vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 7.25 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 25.38 | -21.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than HIBL's maximum drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and HIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -88.27% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | -31.39% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | -69.66% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | -81.58% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.80% | -10.19% | -89.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.90% | -44.05% | -48.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 8.96% | +4.20% |
Volatility
GUSH vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) is 18.07%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 34.70%. This indicates that GUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.07% | 34.70% | -16.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.41% | 57.54% | -13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.06% | 71.43% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.35% | 83.04% | -14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.58% | 92.32% | +1.26% |
GUSH vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than HIBL's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.55% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.28% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and HIBL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (34.70%) compared to GUSH (18.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs HIBL's -88.27%.
On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 10.57% vs 9.46% for GUSH. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 18.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.28% for HIBL.
GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and HIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer