HIBL vs. WEBL
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - HIBL tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%) while WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIBL returned 11.57%/yr vs -16.69%/yr for WEBL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WEBL.
Performance
HIBL vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 96.27% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's 2.28% return.
HIBL
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 38.56%
- YTD
- 96.27%
- 6M
- 98.56%
- 1Y
- 279.13%
- 3Y*
- 62.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBL
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 13.33%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 37.06%
- 5Y*
- -16.69%
- 10Y*
- —
HIBL vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 96.27% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 21.45% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 2.28% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 13.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and WEBL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HIBL and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HIBL vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIBL
WEBL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
HIBL
WEBL
Consumer Cyclical
HIBL
WEBL
Financial Services
HIBL
WEBL
Industrials
HIBL
WEBL
Basic Materials
HIBL
WEBL
-
Communication Services
HIBL
WEBL
Utilities
HIBL
WEBL
-
Healthcare
HIBL
WEBL
Energy
HIBL
WEBL
-
Consumer Defensive
HIBL
WEBL
-
Real Estate
HIBL
-
WEBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
WEBL
HIBL vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.26 | 0.17 | +4.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 0.61 | +3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.08 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.96 | 0.17 | +8.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.84 | 0.36 | +32.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26 | 0.17 | +4.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | -0.21 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.03 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and WEBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -94.44% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.39% | -56.57% | +25.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | -60.82% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | -94.44% | +12.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -69.89% | +67.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.20% | -58.87% | +14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.55% | 25.98% | -17.43% |
Volatility
HIBL vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 21.25% compared to Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) at 15.48%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.25% | 15.48% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.46% | 43.43% | +7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.16% | 56.62% | +9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.16% | 80.68% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.89% | 82.88% | +9.01% |
HIBL vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than WEBL's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.18% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and WEBL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to WEBL (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs WEBL's -94.44%.
On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.57% vs -16.69% for WEBL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 15.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.57% return vs -16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.19% for WEBL.
HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.17% for WEBL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and WEBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer