HIBL vs. WEBL
HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - HIBL tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%) while WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIBL returned 11.69%/yr vs -19.94%/yr for WEBL. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WEBL.
Performance
HIBL vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 51.75% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's 0.79% return.
HIBL
- 1D
- 7.65%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- 6M
- 34.09%
- YTD
- 51.75%
- 1Y
- 117.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.86%
WEBL
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- -1.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.94%
- 5Y*
- -19.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.60M | $5.92M | $6.50M | |
| $5.15M | $4.84M | $6.44M |
HIBL vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 51.75% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 19.23% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.79% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIBL and WEBL is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between HIBL and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HIBL vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIBL
WEBL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
HIBL
WEBL
Industrials
HIBL
WEBL
Financial Services
HIBL
WEBL
Consumer Cyclical
HIBL
WEBL
Healthcare
HIBL
WEBL
Utilities
HIBL
WEBL
-
Basic Materials
HIBL
WEBL
-
Communication Services
HIBL
WEBL
Consumer Defensive
HIBL
WEBL
-
Energy
HIBL
WEBL
-
Real Estate
HIBL
-
WEBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIBL vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank
HIBL
WEBL
HIBL vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.05 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | -0.03 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | -0.06 | +10.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIBL vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and WEBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.27% | -94.44% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.14% | -56.57% | +16.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.66% | -60.82% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.58% | -94.44% | +12.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.29% | -70.33% | +43.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -59.21% | +15.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 28.95% | -17.13% |
Volatility
HIBL vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 29.17% compared to Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) at 19.20%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIBL | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.17% | 19.20% | +9.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.64% | 49.14% | +16.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.06% | 60.73% | +18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 81.30% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.56% | 82.59% | +9.97% |
HIBL vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIBL vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison
HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than WEBL's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.49% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIBL and WEBL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to WEBL (19.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs WEBL's -94.44%.
On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.69% vs -19.94% for WEBL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.69% return vs -19.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.16% for WEBL.
HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.17% for WEBL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIBL and WEBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer