PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIBL vs. WEBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIBL vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 96.27% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's 2.28% return.


HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*

WEBL

1D
-5.95%
1M
13.33%
YTD
2.28%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
37.06%
5Y*
-16.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIBL vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
2.28%2.37%76.78%165.50%-91.04%2.73%132.56%13.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and WEBL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.68

The correlation between HIBL and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HIBL vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIBL
WEBL

Technology

45.8%
37.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
27.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
2.4%

Industrials

11.7%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
29.7%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Healthcare

2.9%
1.1%

Energy

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.6%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

HIBL
45.8%
WEBL
37.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HIBL
12.9%
WEBL
27.7%

Financial Services

HIBL
12.5%
WEBL
2.4%

Industrials

HIBL
11.7%
WEBL
1.4%

Basic Materials

HIBL
4.6%
WEBL

-

Communication Services

HIBL
3.7%
WEBL
29.7%

Utilities

HIBL
3.2%
WEBL

-

Healthcare

HIBL
2.9%
WEBL
1.1%

Energy

HIBL
2.2%
WEBL

-

Consumer Defensive

HIBL
0.6%
WEBL

-

Real Estate

HIBL

-

WEBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIBL vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WEBL
WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBL vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIBLWEBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.26

0.17

+4.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

0.61

+3.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.08

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.96

0.17

+8.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.84

0.36

+32.47

HIBL vs. WEBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is higher than the WEBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and WEBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIBLWEBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26

0.17

+4.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.21

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.03

+0.21

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and WEBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIBLWEBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-94.44%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

-56.57%

+25.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

-60.82%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

-94.44%

+12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-69.89%

+67.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.20%

-58.87%

+14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

25.98%

-17.43%

Volatility

HIBL vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 21.25% compared to Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) at 15.48%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIBLWEBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.25%

15.48%

+5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.46%

43.43%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.16%

56.62%

+9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.16%

80.68%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.89%

82.88%

+9.01%

HIBL vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIBL vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than WEBL's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
0.19%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.79%0.00%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIBL and WEBL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to WEBL (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs WEBL's -94.44%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 11.57% vs -16.69% for WEBL. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 15.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 11.57% return vs -16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.19% for WEBL.

HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 1.17% for WEBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIBL and WEBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer