PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 91.06% return.


GUSE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.25%
6M
9.66%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

UGA

1D
-0.01%
1M
14.56%
6M
70.02%
YTD
91.06%
1Y
88.12%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
25.78%
10Y*
18.03%
ALL TIME*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$364.55K$258.31K$277.29K
$6.47M$5.01M$4.85M

GUSE vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and UGA is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUSE vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSEUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

GUSE vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSEUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-86.59%

+78.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-5.63%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-36.53%

+35.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

Volatility

GUSE vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSEUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

36.11%

-22.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

34.60%

-20.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

37.26%

-23.43%

GUSE vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GUSE and UGA have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.

GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 1.02% for UGA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer