GUSE vs. UGA
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. GUSE is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
GUSE vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
GUSE vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.96% | 2.91% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | -10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and UGA is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
UGA
GUSE vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSE | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.20 | 0.12 | +2.09 |
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -86.59% | +78.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -14.75% | +14.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -36.76% | +35.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.20% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 35.27% | -21.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 34.40% | -20.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 37.27% | -23.59% |
GUSE vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and UGA have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer