GUSE vs. MTUM
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. GUSE is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
GUSE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
GUSE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.96% | 2.91% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.30% | 3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
MTUM
GUSE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.20 | 0.84 | +1.36 |
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -34.08% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.10% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -6.21% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 19.08% | -5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 20.60% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 21.03% | -7.35% |
GUSE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer