GUSE vs. GSLC
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Goldman Sachs. GUSE is actively managed, while GSLC is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
GUSE vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 8.45% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
GUSE vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.48% | 2.38% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.45% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and GSLC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSLC
GUSE vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -33.69% | +25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.71% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -4.37% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 12.26% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 16.71% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 17.67% | -3.72% |
GUSE vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GSLC's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GUSE and GSLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.
GSLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.
Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.09% for GSLC.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer