GUSE vs. BDGS
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
GUSE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.62% | 2.91% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 5.64% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and BDGS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
BDGS
GUSE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.16 | 1.76 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -9.12% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.83% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -0.64% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 6.08% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 8.21% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 8.21% | +5.52% |
GUSE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDGS.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.85% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer