GUSA vs. BUFX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, GUSA returned 21.87% vs 9.64% for BUFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GUSA charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.

Performance

GUSA vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.81% return.

GUSA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: 20.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSA vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	8.07%	12.65%
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	3.81%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSA and BUFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.91

The correlation between GUSA and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GUSA vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSA

GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 59
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BUFX

BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSA vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSA	BUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.40	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.79	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.53	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.38	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	19.91	-9.17

GUSA vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSA and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUSA vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and BUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSA	BUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-2.87%	-16.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-2.87%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-0.61%	-2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-0.25%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.49%	+1.55%

Volatility

GUSA vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 1.22%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSA	BUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	1.22%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	3.39%	+6.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	4.03%	+8.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	4.03%	+13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.28%	4.03%	+13.25%

GUSA vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSA vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	1.00%	0.99%	1.16%	1.36%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSA and BUFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GUSA and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GUSA or BUFX?

GUSA has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to BUFX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSA dropped -19.61% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

Which ETF is better, GUSA or BUFX?

On 1-year performance, GUSA leads with 21.87% vs 9.64% for BUFX. On fees, GUSA is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSA or BUFX?

Over the 1-year period, GUSA has performed better with a 21.87% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSA or BUFX?

GUSA is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSA or BUFX?

GUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

What is the main difference between GUSA and BUFX?

GUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for GUSA and 0.96% for BUFX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.