GURIX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
GURIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GURIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 1.81% | 2.04% | 4.96% | 13.01% | -23.81% | 42.07% | 1.76% | 25.54% | -3.97% | 10.22% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GURIX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.64%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
GURIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GURIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GURIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
GURIX
FASGX
GURIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.21 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.73 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.55 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 6.89 | -5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.21 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.70 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between GURIX and FASGX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GURIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 2.22% | 2.40% | 5.18% | 3.07% | 6.79% | 5.60% | 7.81% | 6.25% | 3.05% | 5.37% | 4.52% | 16.81% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
GURIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -47.35% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -9.07% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -23.54% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | -27.20% | -6.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -7.95% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -6.74% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.04% | +0.74% |
Volatility
GURIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that GURIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GURIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.57% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 7.78% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 12.82% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 12.14% | +5.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 12.56% | +5.41% |