GURIX vs. AGNC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC).

GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014.

Performance

GURIX vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GURIX vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund	3.34%	2.04%	4.96%	13.01%	-23.81%	42.07%	1.76%	25.54%	-3.97%	10.22%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	-3.40%	34.92%	8.90%	10.14%	-21.65%	5.20%	-1.78%	13.31%	-2.46%	23.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's -3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GURIX has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 6.80%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.23% annualized return.

GURIX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -6.55%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 6.81%
• 5Y*: 4.00%
• 10Y*: 6.80%

AGNC

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: -3.40%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: 6.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GURIX vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURIX

GURIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
GURIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GURIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GURIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GURIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GURIX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

AGNC

AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 67
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURIX vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GURIX	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	0.97	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	1.34	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.19	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	1.11	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	3.75	-1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GURIX vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURIX and AGNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GURIX	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	0.97	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.11	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.25	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.42	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between GURIX and AGNC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GURIX vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than AGNC's 14.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund	2.19%	2.40%	5.18%	3.07%	6.79%	5.60%	7.81%	6.25%	3.05%	5.37%	4.52%	16.81%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	14.37%	13.43%	15.64%	14.68%	13.91%	9.57%	10.00%	11.31%	12.31%	10.70%	12.69%	14.30%

Drawdowns

GURIX vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum AGNC drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and AGNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GURIX	AGNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.32%	-54.56%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-18.71%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.30%	-54.56%	+24.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.32%	-54.56%	+21.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.55%	-14.91%	+8.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.00%	-13.60%	+5.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	5.55%	-2.74%

Volatility

GURIX vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) is 4.23%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that GURIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GURIX	AGNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	9.58%	-5.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.72%	15.07%	-6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	22.88%	-7.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	25.71%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	25.31%	-7.33%