GTPE vs. POW
GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTPE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. GTPE is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GTPE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
GTPE vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.
GTPE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.54K | $53.33K | $76.42K | |
| $1.21M | $2.19M | $3.04M |
GTPE vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 15.57% | 1.44% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 31.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTPE and POW is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTPE vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTPE vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTPE | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -28.02% | +19.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -22.73% | +19.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -5.52% | +3.67% |
Volatility
GTPE vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTPE | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 34.38% | -16.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 34.38% | -16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 34.38% | -16.43% |
GTPE vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTPE vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTPE and POW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GTPE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GTPE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.
GTPE is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for GTPE and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer