GTPE vs. HAIL
GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GTPE tracks the MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index while HAIL tracks the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTPE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
GTPE vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than HAIL's 14.12% return.
GTPE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- YTD
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAIL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- -6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
GTPE vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 18.27% | 2.96% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 14.12% | -5.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTPE and HAIL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTPE vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
GTPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAIL
GTPE vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTPE | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTPE vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTPE | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -65.98% | +57.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -39.80% | +38.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -31.65% | +29.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.23% | — |
Volatility
GTPE vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTPE | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 31.51% | -13.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 32.29% | -14.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 31.90% | -13.86% |
GTPE vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTPE vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.67% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTPE and HAIL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GTPE.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.
GTPE tracks MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index, while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 0.45% for HAIL.
Find the right allocation for GTPE and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer