GTE vs. KRP
GTE (Gran Tierra Energy Inc.) and KRP (Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, GTE returned -2.71%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for KRP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTE vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTE achieves a 47.41% return, which is significantly higher than KRP's 31.73% return.
GTE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -23.22%
- 6M
- 42.37%
- YTD
- 47.41%
- 1Y
- 35.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- -2.71%
- 10Y*
- -14.52%
KRP
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- 6M
- 30.95%
- YTD
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- 15.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- —
GTE vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTE Gran Tierra Energy Inc. | 47.41% | -41.36% | 28.19% | -43.03% | 30.07% | 109.21% | -71.80% | -40.55% | -19.63% | 3.85% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 31.73% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTE and KRP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between GTE and KRP shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GTE:
$221.00M
KRP:
$1.45B
GTE:
-$4.92
KRP:
$0.61
GTE:
0.52
KRP:
5.63
GTE:
2.03K
KRP:
3.35
GTE:
$426.18M
KRP:
$309.11M
GTE:
$28.46M
KRP:
$319.28M
GTE:
$192.58M
KRP:
$177.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTE vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
GTE
KRP
GTE vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTE | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 2.01 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTE vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTE drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than KRP's maximum drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTE and KRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTE | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.11% | -80.91% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.85% | -20.50% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.86% | -27.58% | -39.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.67% | -27.58% | -56.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.45% | -5.41% | -88.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.77% | -19.28% | -46.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.99% | 8.01% | +5.98% |
Volatility
GTE vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) at 6.30%. This indicates that GTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTE | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | 6.30% | +14.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.85% | 17.01% | +35.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.35% | 23.05% | +44.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.10% | 28.38% | +35.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.69% | 41.20% | +28.49% |
Dividends
GTE vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
GTE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTE Gran Tierra Energy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.27% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% |
Financials
GTE vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gran Tierra Energy Inc. and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GTE and KRP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTE has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to KRP (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTE dropped -98.11% vs KRP's -80.91%.
KRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTE and KRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer