PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTE vs. AEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTE vs. AEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) and Ameren Corporation (AEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTE achieves a 67.45% return, which is significantly higher than AEE's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GTE has underperformed AEE with an annualized return of -14.08%, while AEE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.


GTE

1D
-1.53%
1M
-16.47%
YTD
67.45%
6M
69.05%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*
-14.08%

AEE

1D
1.82%
1M
1.08%
YTD
13.41%
6M
13.99%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTE vs. AEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy Inc.
67.45%-41.36%28.19%-43.03%30.07%109.21%-71.80%-40.55%-19.63%-10.60%
AEE
Ameren Corporation
13.41%15.31%27.47%-16.07%2.54%17.09%4.26%20.82%13.99%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GTE and AEE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2005

0.10

The correlation between GTE and AEE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTE:

$250.63M

AEE:

$31.10B

EPS

GTE:

-$4.92

AEE:

$5.57

PS Ratio

GTE:

0.59

AEE:

3.45

PB Ratio

GTE:

2.30K

AEE:

2.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTE:

$426.18M

AEE:

$8.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTE:

$28.46M

AEE:

$2.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

GTE:

$192.58M

AEE:

$4.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTE vs. AEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTE
GTE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AEE
AEE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTE vs. AEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) and Ameren Corporation (AEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTEAEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.45

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

6.20

-4.35

GTE vs. AEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the AEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTE and AEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTE vs. AEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTE drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than AEE's maximum drawdown of -60.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTE and AEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTEAEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-60.57%

-37.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.78%

-8.07%

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.86%

-21.83%

-45.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.67%

-27.46%

-56.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.40%

-29.09%

-66.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.56%

-1.60%

-90.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.71%

-11.69%

-54.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.86%

3.18%

+15.68%

Volatility

GTE vs. AEE - Volatility Comparison

Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) has a higher volatility of 16.76% compared to Ameren Corporation (AEE) at 6.13%. This indicates that GTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTEAEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.76%

6.13%

+10.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.65%

12.39%

+38.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.90%

15.89%

+50.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.89%

19.24%

+44.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.60%

21.83%

+47.77%

Dividends

GTE vs. AEE - Dividend Comparison

GTE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEE
Ameren Corporation
2.61%2.84%3.01%3.48%2.65%2.47%2.56%2.50%2.83%3.01%4.08%3.83%
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GTE vs. AEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gran Tierra Energy Inc. and Ameren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202220232024202520260
2.18B
(GTE) Total Revenue
(AEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GTE and AEE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTE has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to AEE (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTE dropped -98.11% vs AEE's -60.57%.

AEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTE and AEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer