PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTE vs. TRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTE vs. TRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) and Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTE achieves a 67.45% return, which is significantly higher than TRX's -8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GTE has underperformed TRX with an annualized return of -14.08%, while TRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.34% annualized return.


GTE

1D
-1.53%
1M
-16.47%
YTD
67.45%
6M
69.05%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*
-14.08%

TRX

1D
-5.08%
1M
-22.94%
YTD
-8.78%
6M
-11.88%
1Y
137.36%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTE vs. TRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy Inc.
67.45%-41.36%28.19%-43.03%30.07%109.21%-71.80%-40.55%-19.63%-10.60%
TRX
Tanzanian Gold Corporation
-8.78%199.97%-19.24%12.37%-14.54%-40.00%6.40%77.14%25.00%-43.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GTE and TRX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2005

0.15

The correlation between GTE and TRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTE:

$250.63M

TRX:

$259.85M

EPS

GTE:

-$4.92

TRX:

-$0.08

PS Ratio

GTE:

0.59

TRX:

2.09

PB Ratio

GTE:

2.30K

TRX:

3.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTE:

$426.18M

TRX:

$118.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTE:

$28.46M

TRX:

$64.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

GTE:

$192.58M

TRX:

$21.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTE vs. TRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTE
GTE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TRX
TRX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTE vs. TRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) and Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTETRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.25

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

5.31

-3.45

GTE vs. TRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the TRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTE and TRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTE vs. TRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTE drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, roughly equal to the maximum TRX drawdown of -97.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTE and TRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTETRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-97.69%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.78%

-61.47%

+27.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.86%

-61.47%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.67%

-61.47%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.40%

-82.39%

-13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.56%

-90.53%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.71%

-72.16%

+6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.86%

26.03%

-7.17%

Volatility

GTE vs. TRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (GTE) is 16.76%, while Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that GTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTETRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.76%

19.06%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.65%

72.85%

-22.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.90%

90.70%

-24.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.89%

60.36%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.60%

72.94%

-3.34%

Dividends

GTE vs. TRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTE nor TRX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GTE vs. TRX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gran Tierra Energy Inc. and Tanzanian Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
34.07M
(GTE) Total Revenue
(TRX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GTE and TRX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRX has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to GTE (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTE dropped -98.11% vs TRX's -97.69%.

TRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTE and TRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer