PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUS having a 10.67% return and VV slightly higher at 10.69%.


GSUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.67%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%34.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and VV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.99

The correlation between GSUS and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
VV

Technology

35.6%
35.9%

Communication Services

11.9%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.6%

Industrials

8.0%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.6%

Technology

GSUS
35.6%
VV
35.9%

Communication Services

GSUS
11.9%
VV
11.2%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.7%
VV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
10.2%
VV
9.8%

Healthcare

GSUS
8.7%
VV
8.6%

Industrials

GSUS
8.0%
VV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.9%
VV
4.8%

Energy

GSUS
3.6%
VV
3.6%

Utilities

GSUS
2.2%
VV
2.7%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.7%
VV
1.7%

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.7%
VV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUSVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.03

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

13.86

-0.15

GSUS vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUSVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.79

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.59

+0.53

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-54.81%

+29.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.21%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-18.97%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-25.66%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.72%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-6.84%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.01%

+0.02%

Volatility

GSUS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.84%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

8.98%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

11.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

17.22%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

18.19%

-1.13%

GSUS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSUS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GSUS and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSUS has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 13.54% for VV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for GSUS.

GSUS and VV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.

GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer