GSUS vs. DFAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC).

GSUS and DFAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. DFAC is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.

Performance

GSUS vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSUS vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF	-4.81%	18.11%	25.25%	27.74%	-19.82%	12.08%
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	-1.60%	15.66%	19.61%	21.96%	-14.93%	9.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than DFAC's -1.60% return.

GSUS

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: -4.81%
• 6M: -2.48%
• 1Y: 17.83%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: —

DFAC

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFAC

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

GSUS

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

GSUS vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS

GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 62
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

DFAC

DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 66
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSUS	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.03	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.56	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.54	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.09	7.28	-0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSUS vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and DFAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSUS	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.03	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.55	+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and DFAC is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GSUS vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than DFAC's 1.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF	1.14%	1.04%	1.19%	1.32%	1.51%	1.13%	0.78%
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	1.03%	0.97%	1.03%	1.20%	1.50%	0.88%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and DFAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSUS	DFAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.62%	-23.12%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-12.79%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.56%	-5.94%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.40%	-5.62%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.71%	-0.11%

Volatility

GSUS vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) have volatilities of 5.33% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSUS	DFAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	5.31%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.61%	9.59%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.45%	18.51%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	17.30%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	17.30%	-0.10%