PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAC vs. DFEOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAC having a 11.90% return and DFEOX slightly lower at 11.59%.


DFAC

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.38%
YTD
11.90%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*

DFEOX

1D
0.90%
1M
1.06%
YTD
11.59%
6M
10.74%
1Y
27.74%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
11.90%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%9.55%
DFEOX
DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I
11.59%16.00%21.35%22.97%-14.99%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAC and DFEOX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.99

The correlation between DFAC and DFEOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAC vs. DFEOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEOX
DFEOX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFEOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFACDFEOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.38

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

15.06

-0.19

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DFEOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAC and DFEOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAC drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum DFEOX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAC and DFEOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFACDFEOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.12%

-56.77%

+33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-8.28%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-19.24%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

-22.86%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.68%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-7.18%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.85%

+0.09%

Volatility

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFACDFEOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.29%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

9.46%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

11.89%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

16.95%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.03%

-0.89%

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAC has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEOX's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAC vs. DFEOX - Dividend Comparison

DFAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than DFEOX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
0.91%0.97%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFEOX
DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I
0.96%1.06%1.13%1.43%4.08%3.69%1.36%3.02%2.37%1.61%1.61%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFAC and DFEOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAC has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to DFEOX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAC dropped -23.12% vs DFEOX's -56.77%.

DFEOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAC and DFEOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer