GSUI vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

GSUI vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -39.93% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.

GSUI

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -12.82%
• YTD: -39.93%
• 6M: -46.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 149.12%
• 6M: 137.09%
• 1Y: 120.48%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 22.16%
• 10Y*: -11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUI vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF	-39.93%	-34.63%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	149.12%	-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUI and UCO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

GSUI vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUI vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSUI	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	-0.34	-0.44

Drawdowns

GSUI vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -60.73%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSUI	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.73%	-99.95%	+39.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.73%	-99.23%	+38.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.81%	-85.49%	+41.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSUI	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	107.79%	57.11%	+50.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.79%	59.78%	+48.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.79%	71.36%	+36.43%

GSUI vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSUI vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSUI nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSUI and UCO in my portfolio?

GSUI and UCO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSUI or UCO?

On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSUI or UCO?

GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSUI or UCO?

GSUI and UCO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GSUI and UCO?

GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.95% for UCO.