GSUI vs. LTCN
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GSUI tracks the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate while LTCN tracks the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for LTCN.
Performance
GSUI vs. LTCN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -49.92% return, which is significantly lower than LTCN's -44.82% return.
GSUI
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- YTD
- -49.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LTCN
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- -37.33%
- YTD
- -44.82%
- 1Y
- -61.34%
- 3Y*
- -16.25%
- 5Y*
- -24.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -33.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.46K | $286.78K | $708.35K | |
| $228.60K | $254.02K | $357.31K |
GSUI vs. LTCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -49.92% | -42.99% |
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust | -44.82% | -10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and LTCN is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. LTCN — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LTCN
GSUI vs. LTCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUI | LTCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.81 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. LTCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, smaller than the maximum LTCN drawdown of -99.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and LTCN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | LTCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -99.58% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -93.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -93.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.45% | -99.36% | +27.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -89.83% | +34.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 50.75% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. LTCN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | LTCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.34% | 64.78% | +34.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.34% | 100.83% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.34% | 140.40% | -41.06% |
GSUI vs. LTCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LTCN's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUI vs. LTCN - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSUI nor LTCN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and LTCN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.
GSUI and LTCN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 2.50% for LTCN.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and LTCN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer