PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSST vs. YFYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSST vs. YFYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than YFYA's 2.34% return.


GSST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

YFYA

1D
0.41%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSST vs. YFYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GSST and YFYA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSST vs. YFYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSST
GSST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSST vs. YFYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSTYFYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+14.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.94

1.40

+2.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.99

3.35

+26.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

185.54

15.29

+170.25

GSST vs. YFYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSST Sharpe Ratio is 7.98, which is higher than the YFYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSST and YFYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSTYFYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98

1.50

+6.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.78

1.10

+2.68

Drawdowns

GSST vs. YFYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, which is greater than YFYA's maximum drawdown of -2.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and YFYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSTYFYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-2.29%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-1.61%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.33%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.35%

-0.33%

Volatility

GSST vs. YFYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.13%, while Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSTYFYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

1.14%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

3.35%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

3.59%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.63%

3.59%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

3.59%

-2.73%

GSST vs. YFYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than YFYA's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSST vs. YFYA - Dividend Comparison

GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than YFYA's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.32%4.56%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
5.14%3.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSST and YFYA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFYA has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSST dropped -3.51% vs YFYA's -2.29%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs 4.61% for GSST. On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 4.32% for GSST.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GSST and 1.16% for YFYA.

GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.98 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSST and YFYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer