GSST vs. SDCI
GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SDCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. GSST is actively managed, while SDCI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSST returned 3.83%/yr vs 20.23%/yr for SDCI. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. GSST charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
GSST vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 27.24% return.
GSST
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 22.83%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 1Y
- 31.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GSST vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.98% | 5.20% | 6.01% | 6.08% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 1.74% | 2.64% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 27.24% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | -10.61% | -6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSST and SDCI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | -0.05 |
The correlation between GSST and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSST vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
GSST
SDCI
GSST vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSST | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.74 | 1.31 | +2.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 28.72 | 2.87 | +25.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 177.22 | 9.00 | +168.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSST vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSST | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -45.79% | +42.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.15% | -11.03% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.25% | -11.96% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.19% | -18.55% | +17.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -4.30% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -11.53% | +11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 3.51% | -3.49% |
Volatility
GSST vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.13%, while USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSST | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 5.40% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.41% | 14.76% | -14.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58% | 17.17% | -16.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 18.43% | -17.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 17.09% | -16.23% |
GSST vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSST vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than SDCI's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.89% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSST and SDCI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDCI has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSST dropped -3.51% vs SDCI's -45.79%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.23% vs 3.83% for GSST. On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.23% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.
GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 2.89% for SDCI.
GSST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GSST and 0.60% for SDCI.
GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.64 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSST and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer