PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSST vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSST vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSST vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.76%5.20%6.01%1.66%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-3.90%19.77%23.22%15.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's -3.90% return.


GSST

1D
0.06%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*

GPIQ

1D
3.19%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSST vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSST vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSST
GSST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSST vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSTGPIQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.29

1.14

+5.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.28

1.77

+9.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.26

1.27

+1.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

18.26

1.92

+16.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

113.51

8.84

+104.66

GSST vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSST Sharpe Ratio is 6.29, which is higher than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSST and GPIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSTGPIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29

1.14

+5.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.72

1.28

+2.44

Correlation

The correlation between GSST and GPIQ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GSST vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than GPIQ's 10.68% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.43%4.56%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
10.68%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSST vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and GPIQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSTGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-21.06%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-12.08%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.63%

+6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-2.37%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.62%

-2.58%

Volatility

GSST vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.25%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSSTGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

6.08%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.42%

11.17%

-10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

20.42%

-19.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.63%

17.74%

-17.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.87%

17.74%

-16.87%