GSSC vs. SLYG
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - GSSC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 9.08%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for SLYG. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
GSSC vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 23.22% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
GSSC vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 19.67% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.39% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 23.22% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and SLYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GSSC and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
SLYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
GSSC
SLYG
Industrials
GSSC
SLYG
Healthcare
GSSC
SLYG
Financial Services
GSSC
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
SLYG
Energy
GSSC
SLYG
Real Estate
GSSC
SLYG
Basic Materials
GSSC
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
SLYG
Communication Services
GSSC
SLYG
Utilities
GSSC
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
SLYG
GSSC vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSSC | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.07 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 10.72 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -62.92% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -9.10% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -27.39% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -29.18% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.96% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -14.85% | +5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.61% | +0.54% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is 3.74%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that GSSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.36% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 13.02% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 17.93% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 21.55% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 22.71% | +0.24% |
GSSC vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SLYG's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.04% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.66% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GSSC and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to GSSC (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 9.08% vs 7.45% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 9.08% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.
GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.
GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.15% for SLYG.
GSSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer