PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSC vs. SLYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSC vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 23.22% return.


GSSC

1D
0.29%
1M
2.33%
6M
14.47%
YTD
19.67%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

SLYG

1D
0.38%
1M
2.65%
6M
17.16%
YTD
23.22%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSC vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
19.67%10.76%11.14%17.27%-16.81%24.13%16.02%23.14%-9.24%8.39%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
23.22%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSC and SLYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017

0.95

The correlation between GSSC and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSSC vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSSC
SLYG

Technology

18.2%
17.5%

Industrials

17.6%
18.8%

Healthcare

16.6%
17.0%

Financial Services

16.6%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.9%

Energy

4.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.3%
6.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.8%

Utilities

2.1%
1.7%

Technology

GSSC
18.2%
SLYG
17.5%

Industrials

GSSC
17.6%
SLYG
18.8%

Healthcare

GSSC
16.6%
SLYG
17.0%

Financial Services

GSSC
16.6%
SLYG
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GSSC
10.1%
SLYG
10.9%

Energy

GSSC
4.3%
SLYG
4.5%

Real Estate

GSSC
4.3%
SLYG
6.5%

Basic Materials

GSSC
3.9%
SLYG
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

GSSC
3.8%
SLYG
3.0%

Communication Services

GSSC
2.6%
SLYG
2.8%

Utilities

GSSC
2.1%
SLYG
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSC vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSC
GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSC vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSSCSLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.07

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

10.72

-1.17

GSSC vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSC and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSSC vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and SLYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSCSLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-62.92%

+21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.10%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-27.39%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-29.18%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-2.96%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-14.85%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.61%

+0.54%

Volatility

GSSC vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is 3.74%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that GSSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSCSLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.36%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

13.02%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

17.93%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

21.55%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

22.71%

+0.24%

GSSC vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSSC vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SLYG's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.04%1.17%1.42%1.33%1.31%1.00%0.94%1.24%1.21%0.73%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GSSC and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to GSSC (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs SLYG's -62.92%.

On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 9.08% vs 7.45% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 9.08% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.

GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.

GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.15% for SLYG.

GSSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSC and SLYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer