GSSC vs. ESML
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - GSSC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while ESML tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 7.82%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for ESML. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ESML.
Performance
GSSC vs. ESML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSSC having a 18.62% return and ESML slightly higher at 18.72%.
GSSC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 18.62%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ESML
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 33.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GSSC vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.62% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.96% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 18.72% | 10.62% | 12.01% | 17.27% | -17.28% | 19.28% | 19.56% | 29.12% | -10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and ESML is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GSSC and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. ESML - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
ESML
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
GSSC
ESML
Industrials
GSSC
ESML
Healthcare
GSSC
ESML
Financial Services
GSSC
ESML
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
ESML
Energy
GSSC
ESML
Real Estate
GSSC
ESML
Basic Materials
GSSC
ESML
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
ESML
Communication Services
GSSC
ESML
Utilities
GSSC
ESML
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
ESML
GSSC vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSSC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.77 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 13.82 | -3.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ESML drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and ESML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -41.97% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -9.04% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -26.68% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -28.61% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.91% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.46% | +0.69% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 5.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 12.37% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 17.14% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 21.28% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 23.39% | -0.39% |
GSSC vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSSC vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than ESML's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.81% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GSSC and ESML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSSC has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to ESML (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs ESML's -41.97%.
On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 7.82% vs 7.23% for ESML. On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSSC.
ESML has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.81% for GSSC.
GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.17% for ESML.
ESML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and ESML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer