GSSC vs. DWAS
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 7.20%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for DWAS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DWAS.
Performance
GSSC vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than DWAS's 18.88% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 39.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
GSSC vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 13.55% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.77% |
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 18.88% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and DWAS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GSSC and DWAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
DWAS
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
GSSC
DWAS
Financial Services
GSSC
DWAS
Healthcare
GSSC
DWAS
Technology
GSSC
DWAS
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
DWAS
Energy
GSSC
DWAS
Real Estate
GSSC
DWAS
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
DWAS
Basic Materials
GSSC
DWAS
Communication Services
GSSC
DWAS
Utilities
GSSC
DWAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
DWAS
GSSC vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSC | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 4.00 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 13.05 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSC | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.76 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.24 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and DWAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -46.16% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.02% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -33.83% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -33.83% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -1.72% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -10.30% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.06% | +0.10% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is 5.31%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that GSSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 6.81% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 16.88% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 22.81% | -4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 25.70% | -4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 26.60% | -3.58% |
GSSC vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSSC vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than DWAS's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSSC and DWAS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to GSSC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs DWAS's -46.16%.
On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 7.20% vs 6.21% for DWAS. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.60% for DWAS.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and DWAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer