GSL vs. PFFA
GSL (Global Ship Lease, Inc.) is a stock, while PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past 5 years, GSL returned 27.89%/yr vs 6.64%/yr for PFFA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSL vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSL achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 3.42% return.
GSL
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 60.37%
- 3Y*
- 37.38%
- 5Y*
- 27.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
PFFA
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GSL vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 11.66% | 73.47% | 18.09% | 28.97% | -22.16% | 100.35% | 34.65% | 78.02% | -57.24% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 3.42% | 8.22% | 16.11% | 26.45% | -20.91% | 23.53% | -7.87% | 31.99% | -7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSL and PFFA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSL vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank
GSL
PFFA
GSL vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSL | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.28 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.96 | 7.75 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSL | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.11 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.24 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
GSL vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSL drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than PFFA's maximum drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSL and PFFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSL | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -70.52% | -24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.09% | -6.49% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.82% | -12.15% | -23.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -22.70% | -24.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | -1.17% | -7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.79% | -6.65% | -52.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.90% | +3.63% |
Volatility
GSL vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.87%. This indicates that GSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSL | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 1.87% | +7.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.64% | 5.69% | +14.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.67% | 7.03% | +20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.51% | 11.51% | +26.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.82% | 31.84% | +22.98% |
Dividends
GSL vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
GSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than PFFA's 9.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 6.33% | 6.06% | 7.56% | 7.57% | 8.26% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.69% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.59% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSL and PFFA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSL has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSL dropped -95.26% vs PFFA's -70.52%.
GSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSL and PFFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer