GSL vs. ZIM
GSL (Global Ship Lease, Inc.) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, GSL returned 29.48%/yr vs 21.87%/yr for ZIM. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
GSL vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSL achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 22.66% return.
GSL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 21.87%
- YTD
- 30.57%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.48%
- 10Y*
- 18.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.70%
ZIM
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 21.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.84M | $11.45M | $12.93M | |
| $18.00M | $25.35M | $31.22M |
GSL vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 30.57% | 73.47% | 18.09% | 28.97% | -22.16% | 99.35% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 22.66% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSL and ZIM is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between GSL and ZIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
GSL:
$1.59B
ZIM:
$3.04B
GSL:
$10.72
ZIM:
$0.81
GSL:
4.13
ZIM:
31.01
GSL:
0.15
ZIM:
0.18
GSL:
2.08
ZIM:
0.48
GSL:
0.87
ZIM:
0.79
GSL:
$770.24M
ZIM:
$6.29B
GSL:
$409.23M
ZIM:
$676.00M
GSL:
$528.32M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSL vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
GSL
ZIM
GSL vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSL | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 2.28 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 5.41 | +5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSL vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSL drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSL and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSL | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.26% | -84.68% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.09% | -29.84% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.82% | -57.12% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -84.68% | +37.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -11.77% | +11.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -39.23% | -19.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.98% | 12.54% | -6.56% |
Volatility
GSL vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) is 7.10%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that GSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSL | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 11.11% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 34.35% | -13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.24% | 52.13% | -23.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.25% | 65.10% | -28.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.94% | 66.98% | -13.04% |
Dividends
GSL vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
GSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than ZIM's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 5.41% | 6.06% | 7.56% | 7.57% | 8.26% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.69% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.96% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GSL vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GSL vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
GSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
GSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
GSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSL and ZIM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to GSL (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSL dropped -95.26% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
GSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSL and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer