PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSL vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GSL vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSL vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
7.96%73.47%18.09%28.97%-22.16%102.74%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
28.30%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSL:

$1.34B

ZIM:

$3.18B

EPS

GSL:

$11.65

ZIM:

$3.98

PE Ratio

GSL:

3.20

ZIM:

6.63

PEG Ratio

GSL:

0.12

ZIM:

0.04

PS Ratio

GSL:

1.75

ZIM:

0.46

PB Ratio

GSL:

0.74

ZIM:

0.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSL:

$759.92M

ZIM:

$6.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSL:

$404.40M

ZIM:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

GSL:

$557.27M

ZIM:

$2.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSL achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 28.30% return.


GSL

1D
3.53%
1M
-9.37%
YTD
7.96%
6M
25.54%
1Y
75.36%
3Y*
35.46%
5Y*
29.08%
10Y*
19.22%

ZIM

1D
1.82%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
28.30%
6M
104.13%
1Y
98.85%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
32.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSL vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSL vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLZIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.57

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

2.42

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.68

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.97

6.03

+5.93

GSL vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSL and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLZIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.57

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.49

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.80

-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between GSL and ZIM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GSL vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

GSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than ZIM's 7.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.18%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
7.55%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSL vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSL drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSL and ZIM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-84.68%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.17%

-32.64%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-84.68%

+37.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.42%

-6.94%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.33%

-41.12%

-18.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

14.49%

-8.34%

Volatility

GSL vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 9.55%. This indicates that GSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSLZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.20%

9.55%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.90%

40.45%

-19.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.66%

63.53%

-31.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.07%

67.47%

-29.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.07%

68.52%

-12.45%

Financials

GSL vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
190.95M
1.48B
(GSL) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GSL vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
51.0%
5.6%
Portfolio components
GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.38M and revenue of 190.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 87.72M and revenue of 190.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 102.61M and revenue of 190.95M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.