GSKH vs. TMH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both exchange-traded funds - GSKH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return, while TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

GSKH vs. TMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSKH

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 9.31%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 43.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMH

• 1D: 3.07%
• 1M: -7.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSKH vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.00%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GSKH and TMH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

GSKH vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 52
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

TMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSKH vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSKH	TMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	—	—

Drawdowns

GSKH vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and TMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSKH	TMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-10.32%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.10%	-7.56%	-4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-6.26%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSKH	TMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.18%	27.26%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	27.26%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.91%	27.26%	-0.35%

GSKH vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSKH and TMH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSKH vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison

GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than TMH's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.84%	1.15%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	5.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSKH and TMH in my portfolio?

GSKH and TMH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSKH or TMH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSKH or TMH?

GSKH and TMH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSKH or TMH?

TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 2.84% for GSKH.

What is the main difference between GSKH and TMH?

GSKH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while TMH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return.