PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. MJFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than MJFOX's 16.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSJY having a 9.13% annualized return and MJFOX not far behind at 8.77%.


GSJY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.72%
6M
7.48%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
9.18%

MJFOX

1D
4.86%
1M
0.25%
6M
11.30%
YTD
16.42%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$191.85K$206.89K$274.32K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
14.27%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.42%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and MJFOX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.84

The correlation between GSJY and MJFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. MJFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSJYMJFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.11

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

7.09

-0.15

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the MJFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and MJFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum MJFOX drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and MJFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYMJFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-63.52%

+30.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-14.53%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-17.14%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-42.85%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-42.85%

+10.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-4.62%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-21.15%

+13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.28%

+0.10%

Volatility

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 6.93%, while Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYMJFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

8.47%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

20.00%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

23.80%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

20.97%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

19.10%

-1.94%

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MJFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. MJFOX - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than MJFOX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
2.03%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.68%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and MJFOX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MJFOX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to GSJY (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs MJFOX's -63.52%.

GSJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and MJFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer