GSJY vs. HEWJ
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index while HEWJ tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSJY returned 9.28%/yr vs 16.48%/yr for HEWJ. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HEWJ.
Performance
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 20.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 9.28%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
HEWJ
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 52.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 20.42% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and HEWJ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GSJY and HEWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSJY
HEWJ
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
GSJY
HEWJ
Financial Services
GSJY
HEWJ
Technology
GSJY
HEWJ
Consumer Cyclical
GSJY
HEWJ
Communication Services
GSJY
HEWJ
Healthcare
GSJY
HEWJ
Energy
GSJY
HEWJ
Basic Materials
GSJY
HEWJ
Consumer Defensive
GSJY
HEWJ
Real Estate
GSJY
HEWJ
Utilities
GSJY
HEWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
HEWJ
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSJY | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.51 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 5.07 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 19.91 | -12.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSJY | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.82 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.13 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.69 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum HEWJ drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and HEWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -31.53% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -10.37% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -20.90% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -20.90% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | -31.53% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | 0.00% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -6.61% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.64% | +1.57% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) at 3.91%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.91% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 13.66% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 18.65% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 19.04% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.65% | -2.61% |
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSJY vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than HEWJ's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.24% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to HEWJ (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.
On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 16.48% vs 9.28% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 16.48% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.
GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and HEWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer