GSJY vs. GVIP
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSJY is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSJY returned 8.87%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for GVIP. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.
Performance
GSJY vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.34% return.
GSJY
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
GVIP
- 1D
- -6.01%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 35.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
GSJY vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 12.58% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.34% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -6.85% | 25.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and GVIP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GSJY and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSJY vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSJY
GVIP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
GSJY
GVIP
Technology
GSJY
GVIP
Financial Services
GSJY
GVIP
Consumer Cyclical
GSJY
GVIP
Communication Services
GSJY
GVIP
Healthcare
GSJY
GVIP
Basic Materials
GSJY
GVIP
-
Energy
GSJY
GVIP
-
Consumer Defensive
GSJY
GVIP
Utilities
GSJY
GVIP
Real Estate
GSJY
GVIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
GVIP
GSJY vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSJY | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.61 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 11.04 | -3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and GVIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -37.09% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -13.67% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -23.29% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -37.09% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -6.01% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -7.56% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 3.23% | +1.06% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 7.37%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 11.43% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 17.87% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 21.01% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 21.83% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 21.87% | -4.77% |
GSJY vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSJY vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.76% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and GVIP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to GSJY (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs GVIP's -37.09%.
On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 12.53% vs 8.87% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GSJY is categorized as Japan Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.45% for GVIP.
GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and GVIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer