GSIG vs. UGA
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Their -0.10 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
GSIG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 70.02%
- YTD
- 91.06%
- 1Y
- 88.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 25.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.47M | $5.01M | $4.85M |
GSIG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 91.06% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | 20.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and UGA is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GSIG and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UGA
GSIG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -86.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.63% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -36.53% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 36.11% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 34.60% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 37.26% | — |
GSIG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 3.60% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and UGA have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer