PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. GHYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than GHYB's 1.16% return.


GSIG

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*

GHYB

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.43%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.68%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.16%9.38%7.76%12.13%-11.02%3.21%8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and GHYB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.57

The correlation between GSIG and GHYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG
GSIG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYB
GHYB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIGGHYBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

1.98

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

2.94

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.38

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.59

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.77

11.87

+0.90

GSIG vs. GHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the GHYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIG and GHYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIGGHYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.98

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.52

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and GHYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGGHYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-21.48%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.67%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-4.66%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-16.08%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.36%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-2.57%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.58%

-0.22%

Volatility

GSIG vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) is 0.57%, while Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that GSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGGHYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

1.08%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

2.72%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

3.51%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

7.69%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

8.28%

-5.57%

GSIG vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIG vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GHYB's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.81%7.00%6.65%6.20%5.67%4.46%4.75%5.57%5.68%1.45%
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
4.34%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and GHYB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to GSIG (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs GHYB's -21.48%.

On 5-year performance, GHYB leads with 3.99% vs 2.18% for GSIG. On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, GSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GHYB has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.

GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 4.34% for GSIG.

GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.34% for GHYB.

GSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and GHYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer