GHYB vs. BSJP
GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - GHYB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index while BSJP tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHYB charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJP.
Performance
GHYB vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GHYB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -11.02% | 3.21% | 6.38% | 14.55% | -2.01% | 0.37% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYB and BSJP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GHYB and BSJP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYB vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank
GHYB
BSJP
GHYB vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYB | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYB | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GHYB vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYB | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
GHYB vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYB | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.69% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.28% | — | — |
GHYB vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYB vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison
GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than BSJP's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.26% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYB and BSJP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 2.26% for BSJP.
GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GHYB and 0.42% for BSJP.
Find the right allocation for GHYB and BSJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer