GHYB vs. SJNK
GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SJNK (SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - GHYB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index while SJNK tracks the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GHYB returned 3.95%/yr vs 4.77%/yr for SJNK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GHYB charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SJNK.
Performance
GHYB vs. SJNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SJNK's 1.65% return.
GHYB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SJNK
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
GHYB vs. SJNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -11.02% | 3.21% | 6.38% | 14.55% | -2.01% | 0.27% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 1.65% | 7.68% | 8.24% | 11.63% | -5.50% | 5.06% | 5.82% | 9.49% | -0.27% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYB and SJNK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GHYB and SJNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYB vs. SJNK — Risk / Return Rank
GHYB
SJNK
GHYB vs. SJNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHYB | SJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.43 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 14.73 | -3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHYB vs. SJNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYB drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than SJNK's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYB and SJNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYB | SJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -19.74% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -1.73% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -4.77% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | -10.18% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.16% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -1.63% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.40% | +0.19% |
Volatility
GHYB vs. SJNK - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) at 0.87%. This indicates that GHYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYB | SJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.87% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.52% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 3.24% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.70% | 5.84% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 6.47% | +1.79% |
GHYB vs. SJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SJNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYB vs. SJNK - Dividend Comparison
GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, less than SJNK's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.00% | 7.12% | 7.47% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, GHYB and SJNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GHYB has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to SJNK (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYB dropped -21.48% vs SJNK's -19.74%.
On 5-year performance, SJNK leads with 4.77% vs 3.95% for GHYB. On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SJNK has performed better with a 4.77% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.
SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.79% for GHYB.
GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while SJNK tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 0-5 Yr 2% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GHYB and 0.40% for SJNK.
GHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHYB and SJNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer