GSIG vs. FLRN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN).

GSIG and FLRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIG is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2020. FLRN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. Both GSIG and FLRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GSIG vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSIG vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	0.13%	6.69%	4.72%	6.06%	-5.80%	-0.81%	1.59%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	0.77%	5.01%	6.32%	6.54%	1.31%	0.39%	0.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 0.77% return.

GSIG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: 2.21%
• 10Y*: —

FLRN

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 2.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FLRN

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF

GSIG

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF

Return for Risk

GSIG vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG

GSIG Risk / Return Rank: 93
GSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FLRN

FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSIG	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.49	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.11	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.05	-0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	3.21	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	26.27	-12.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSIG vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIG and FLRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSIG	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.49	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	2.38	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.49	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and FLRN is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GSIG vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than FLRN's 4.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF	4.44%	4.61%	4.59%	3.51%	2.21%	1.04%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.65%	4.89%	5.67%	5.68%	1.95%	0.39%	1.22%	2.76%	2.39%	1.64%	1.06%	0.63%

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and FLRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIG	FLRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.57%	-14.64%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.46%	-1.43%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.57%	-2.16%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.07%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-1.85%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.17%	+0.18%

Volatility

GSIG vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.36%. This indicates that GSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIG	FLRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	0.36%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.20%	0.55%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	1.82%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.87%	1.69%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.73%	4.21%	-1.48%