PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.


GSIG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.67%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and BSCR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.88

The correlation between GSIG and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG
GSIG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIGBSCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

4.26

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

7.98

-4.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.11

-0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

11.03

-7.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.63

46.87

-34.24

GSIG vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIG and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIGBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

4.26

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.36

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.59

+0.20

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-17.26%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-0.42%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-2.41%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-14.87%

+5.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.35%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.10%

+0.26%

Volatility

GSIG vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that GSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.19%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.59%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.08%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

4.09%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

5.35%

-2.64%

GSIG vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIG vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
4.34%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and BSCR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIG has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, GSIG leads with 2.21% vs 1.47% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSIG has performed better with a 2.21% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.

GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer