GSIG vs. BNO
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. Both are passively managed. Their -0.10 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
GSIG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- 6M
- 52.90%
- YTD
- 77.90%
- 1Y
- 62.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.13M | $97.34M | $147.52M |
GSIG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 77.90% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and BNO is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GSIG and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.36, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNO
GSIG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -87.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -16.21% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.99% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.86% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.54% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 36.41% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 36.98% | — |
GSIG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 3.60% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and BNO have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 1.00% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer