PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSIG

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M

GSIG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.68%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and BNO is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GSIG and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.36, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSIG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIGBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

GSIG vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

Volatility

GSIG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.98%

GSIG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
3.60%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and BNO have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 1.00% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer