GSIB vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. GSIB is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, GSIB returned 48.44% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GSIB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

GSIB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

GSIB

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 7.54%
• YTD: 16.30%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 48.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	16.30%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	-2.00%	3.77%	-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIB and UGA is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	-0.07

The correlation between GSIB and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSIB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 80
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 70

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSIB	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	1.73	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.25	+1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.30	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.17	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.33	9.39	+2.94

GSIB vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIB and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSIB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIB	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-86.59%	+68.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.90%	-18.96%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-18.05%	+17.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-36.69%	+34.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	6.43%	-2.49%

Volatility

GSIB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) is 4.91%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that GSIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIB	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	9.24%	-4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	30.57%	-16.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.41%	35.22%	-17.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	34.45%	-16.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	37.22%	-18.77%

GSIB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSIB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.64%	1.91%	1.67%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIB and UGA in my portfolio?

GSIB and UGA have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSIB or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to GSIB (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIB dropped -17.71% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, GSIB or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 59.74% vs 48.44% for GSIB. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSIB or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 59.74% return vs 48.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSIB or UGA?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSIB or UGA?

GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between GSIB and UGA?

GSIB is categorized as Financials Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSIB and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.