PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGRX vs. GSBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGRX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than GSBFX's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGRX has outperformed GSBFX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while GSBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.


GSGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.77%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.72%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.38%

GSBFX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.95%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.34%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
7.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
12.62%12.48%25.98%8.19%-5.28%21.83%3.49%24.98%-6.11%10.37%
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.23%10.42%9.32%9.64%-9.53%10.50%9.53%19.38%-4.92%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGRX and GSBFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.94

The correlation between GSGRX and GSBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGRX vs. GSBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGRX
GSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GSBFX
GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGRXGSBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

3.16

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

13.72

+3.24

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the GSBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGRX and GSBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGRXGSBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.56

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.76

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.70

-0.23

Drawdowns

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, which is greater than GSBFX's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGRX and GSBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGRXGSBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-37.04%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-4.44%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-8.14%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.02%

-15.94%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.11%

-23.42%

-11.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-4.18%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.02%

+0.41%

Volatility

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that GSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGRXGSBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

1.76%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

4.45%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

5.49%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

7.41%

+8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

7.99%

+9.20%

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSBFX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGRX vs. GSBFX - Dividend Comparison

GSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than GSBFX's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.09%4.39%5.12%3.41%4.10%6.66%3.05%3.52%3.98%3.52%3.78%3.93%
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
8.93%9.72%18.35%4.70%4.42%8.01%1.52%5.56%2.67%1.69%1.79%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGRX and GSBFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSGRX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to GSBFX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGRX dropped -54.44% vs GSBFX's -37.04%.

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGRX and GSBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer