GSGRX vs. HFCVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSGRX (Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund) and HFCVX (Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSGRX returned 11.38%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for HFCVX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSGRX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for HFCVX.

Performance

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGRX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSGRX having a 11.38% annualized return and HFCVX not far behind at 11.15%.

GSGRX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

HFCVX

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 16.75%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund	12.62%	12.48%	25.98%	8.19%	-5.28%	21.83%	3.49%	24.98%	-6.11%	10.37%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	13.70%	18.27%	9.59%	5.81%	6.12%	29.94%	-6.39%	20.84%	-9.50%	19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGRX and HFCVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996	0.88

The correlation between GSGRX and HFCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSGRX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGRX

GSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
GSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
GSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

HFCVX

HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 89
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSGRX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.91	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	4.22	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.51	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	7.07	-2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	21.66	-4.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGRX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSGRX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.91	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.89	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.68	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.41	+0.06

Drawdowns

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGRX and HFCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSGRX	HFCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.44%	-65.75%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-3.77%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.02%	-11.32%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.02%	-16.81%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.11%	-39.39%	+4.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.29%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.38%	-8.24%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	1.23%	+0.20%

Volatility

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSGRX	HFCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	2.79%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	6.85%	+1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.17%	9.16%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	13.26%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	16.46%	+0.73%

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSGRX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

GSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund	8.93%	9.72%	18.35%	4.70%	4.42%	8.01%	1.52%	5.56%	2.67%	1.69%	1.79%	1.90%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	6.50%	7.39%	4.56%	3.57%	10.33%	4.81%	2.58%	6.58%	17.16%	14.97%	2.26%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSGRX and HFCVX in my portfolio?

GSGRX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSGRX or HFCVX?

GSGRX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGRX dropped -54.44% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.