GSGO vs. CCOR
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
GSGO vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -4.04% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- -5.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- —
GSGO vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 8.99% | 0.81% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -4.04% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and CCOR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CCOR
GSGO vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -22.99% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -20.30% | +16.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -7.34% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 7.44% | +11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 11.14% | +7.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 10.76% | +8.08% |
GSGO vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and CCOR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 1.09% for CCOR.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer