PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEU vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEU vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSEU having a 9.21% annualized return and NORW not far ahead at 9.61%.


GSEU

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.97%
YTD
5.62%
6M
9.09%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.21%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEU vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
5.62%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%17.33%6.64%24.57%-14.29%26.97%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEU and NORW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between GSEU and NORW has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GSEU vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEU
NORW

Financial Services

24.7%
22.6%

Industrials

19.9%
13.3%

Healthcare

13.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
12.5%

Technology

8.1%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
10.9%

Utilities

4.8%
0.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
5.9%

Energy

4.4%
29.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

GSEU
24.7%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

GSEU
19.9%
NORW
13.3%

Healthcare

GSEU
13.1%
NORW

-

Consumer Defensive

GSEU
8.4%
NORW
12.5%

Technology

GSEU
8.1%
NORW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEU
6.6%
NORW
0.2%

Basic Materials

GSEU
5.0%
NORW
10.9%

Utilities

GSEU
4.8%
NORW
0.7%

Communication Services

GSEU
4.6%
NORW
5.9%

Energy

GSEU
4.4%
NORW
29.4%

Real Estate

GSEU
0.6%
NORW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEU vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEU vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEUNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.95

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

11.27

-5.73

GSEU vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEU and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEUNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.18

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.37

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.40

+0.12

Drawdowns

GSEU vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, roughly equal to the maximum NORW drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEUNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.71%

-35.62%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-9.18%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-16.06%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

-32.78%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

-33.86%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-3.53%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-10.13%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.21%

-0.05%

Volatility

GSEU vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that GSEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEUNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

4.06%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

12.73%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

16.70%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

21.88%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

20.80%

-2.69%

GSEU vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEU vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.58%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%0.00%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEU and NORW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEU has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 9.21% for GSEU. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.58% for GSEU.

GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEU and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer