GSEU vs. FEDM
GSEU (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF) and FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FEDM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSEU returned 17.27%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for FEDM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FEDM.
Performance
GSEU vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSEU having a 6.97% return and FEDM slightly lower at 6.95%.
GSEU
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEU vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 6.97% | 35.70% | 2.00% | 20.74% | -17.90% | 2.76% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 6.95% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 17.39% | -15.25% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEU and FEDM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between GSEU and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEU vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEU
FEDM
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSEU
FEDM
Industrials
GSEU
FEDM
Healthcare
GSEU
FEDM
Consumer Defensive
GSEU
FEDM
Technology
GSEU
FEDM
Consumer Cyclical
GSEU
FEDM
Basic Materials
GSEU
FEDM
Utilities
GSEU
FEDM
Communication Services
GSEU
FEDM
Energy
GSEU
FEDM
Real Estate
GSEU
FEDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEU vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank
GSEU
FEDM
GSEU vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEU | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.41 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 5.07 | +0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEU | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.04 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GSEU vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and FEDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEU | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.71% | -29.37% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -11.92% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.12% | -14.24% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.16% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -6.99% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.30% | -0.14% |
Volatility
GSEU vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) at 4.71%. This indicates that GSEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEU | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 4.71% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 12.47% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 16.14% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 16.46% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 16.46% | +1.65% |
GSEU vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSEU vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison
GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FEDM's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 2.55% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 3.41% | 3.34% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 3.69% | 3.40% | 2.51% | 2.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEU and FEDM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEU has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to FEDM (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs FEDM's -29.37%.
On 3-year performance, GSEU leads with 17.27% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSEU.
FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.55% for GSEU.
GSEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FEDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.12% for FEDM.
GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEU and FEDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer