GSEU vs. FEZ
GSEU (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - GSEU tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index while FEZ tracks the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSEU returned 10.17%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for FEZ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSEU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
GSEU vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSEU having a 6.37% return and FEZ slightly higher at 6.43%. Over the past 10 years, GSEU has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 10.17%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
GSEU
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
FEZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
GSEU vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 6.37% | 35.70% | 2.00% | 20.74% | -17.90% | 17.33% | 6.64% | 24.57% | -14.29% | 26.97% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.43% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEU and FEZ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GSEU and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEU vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEU
FEZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
GSEU
FEZ
Industrials
GSEU
FEZ
Healthcare
GSEU
FEZ
Technology
GSEU
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
GSEU
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
GSEU
FEZ
Basic Materials
GSEU
FEZ
Utilities
GSEU
FEZ
Energy
GSEU
FEZ
Communication Services
GSEU
FEZ
Real Estate
GSEU
FEZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEU vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
GSEU
FEZ
GSEU vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEU | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.42 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 4.82 | +1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEU vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEU | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.71% | -64.21% | +28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -13.63% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.12% | -15.85% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.98% | -35.05% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.71% | -39.69% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -2.33% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -17.04% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.99% | -0.83% |
Volatility
GSEU vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) is 4.52%, while State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that GSEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEU | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 5.85% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 15.57% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.40% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 20.70% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 20.75% | -2.98% |
GSEU vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEU vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than FEZ's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.64% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 3.41% | 3.34% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 3.69% | 3.40% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GSEU and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEZ has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to GSEU (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 10.17% for GSEU. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.56% for GSEU.
GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.29% for FEZ.
GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEU and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer