PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEU vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEU vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GSEU has underperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 9.21%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


GSEU

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.97%
YTD
5.62%
6M
9.09%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.21%

FEZ

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.21%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.87%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEU vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
5.62%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%17.33%6.64%24.57%-14.29%26.97%
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
5.18%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEU and FEZ is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.93

The correlation between GSEU and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEU vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEU
FEZ

Financial Services

24.7%
23.4%

Industrials

19.9%
20.1%

Healthcare

13.1%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
5.4%

Technology

8.1%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
8.6%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.5%

Utilities

4.8%
4.6%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.5%

Energy

4.4%
5.0%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

GSEU
24.7%
FEZ
23.4%

Industrials

GSEU
19.9%
FEZ
20.1%

Healthcare

GSEU
13.1%
FEZ
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

GSEU
8.4%
FEZ
5.4%

Technology

GSEU
8.1%
FEZ
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEU
6.6%
FEZ
8.6%

Basic Materials

GSEU
5.0%
FEZ
3.5%

Utilities

GSEU
4.8%
FEZ
4.6%

Communication Services

GSEU
4.6%
FEZ
3.5%

Energy

GSEU
4.4%
FEZ
5.0%

Real Estate

GSEU
0.6%
FEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEU vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEU vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEUFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.25

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

4.25

+1.29

GSEU vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEU and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEUFEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.95

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.30

+0.22

Drawdowns

GSEU vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEUFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.71%

-64.21%

+28.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-13.63%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-15.85%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

-35.05%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

-39.69%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.33%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-17.07%

+10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.99%

-0.83%

Volatility

GSEU vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) is 5.58%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that GSEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEUFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

6.72%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

14.85%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

17.91%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

20.61%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

21.11%

-3.00%

GSEU vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEU vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, which matches FEZ's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.57%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.58%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GSEU and FEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEZ has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to GSEU (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.28% vs 9.21% for GSEU. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.

GSEU and FEZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.58%.

GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.29% for FEZ.

GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEU and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer