PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 23.34% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


GSEE

1D
-5.32%
1M
2.31%
YTD
23.34%
6M
23.87%
1Y
45.47%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
23.34%33.38%4.94%11.03%-19.57%-2.61%43.54%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%63.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and UGA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.15

The correlation between GSEE and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEEUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.17

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

9.39

+3.32

GSEE vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-86.59%

+49.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-18.96%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-26.68%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.89%

-38.11%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-18.05%

+12.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-36.69%

+22.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

6.43%

-2.84%

Volatility

GSEE vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.17%

9.24%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.00%

30.57%

-10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

35.22%

-13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

34.45%

-15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

37.22%

-18.39%

GSEE vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.05%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and UGA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEE has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 7.00% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

GSEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

GSEE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.75% for UGA.

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer